With behavioural simulation, it is also possible to
simulate a large number of transition states.
The schematics shown is the design of an assembly
line to manufacture engine. Mainly each step
is represented by 2 inputs :
           

Part availability
Downstream request
			
        and 2 ouputs :
           

Part fabrication
Upstream acknowledgement
			
Using experimental design (superposed on the image on the right)
to reduce number of tests, and using Saber as a simulator, allows
to dramatically improve mass production.
			

Nowadays you cannot design electrotechnical system by hand
if you want to spare energy and avoid harmonics.

One of the main difference between Spice based software and
Saber are case when you have to have to use unusual model.

For instance, non-linear magnetics and non-linear loads
are solved fast and accurately with Saber.
Another major point is to use the main functionnalities
of specific IC. Spice only offer the bulk of it, not the details.
			

This design use two powerful features of Saber, but are
unfortunately often ignore : the Netlister and "state" 
variables.

A phone displacement is modelled using angle direction as 
connection (pin) so it makes many connections as it depends
of a BTS (Base station subsystem) which is included in a BSC 
(Base station controller) and all manage by MSC 
(Mobile Switching Center). The netlister avoids to have 
dizains of wires scrambling the schematics.

The state variables allows to have a complex logic
not only based on "0" and "1" but many, which allow
an extremely fast and dense informations exchange.

			

Consumer electronics is easy to integrate with Saber.
The design right is based on diac and triac which
are implemented mostly as behavioural components.

But Saber is so fast that it allows Monte-Carlo simulation;
the program used here was not the Monte-Carlo own
feature of Saber, but a Tcl/Tk program to release
memory (and free space) at each step.

Results were given about mass-production yield
and most important parameters.